Rescher's unsuccessful evolutionary argument
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):295-301 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIris Einheuser (2010). The Model-Theoretic Argument Against Quantifying Over Everything. Dialectica 64 (2):237-246.
Yuichi Amitani (2008). The Frequency Hypothesis and Evolutionary Arguments. Kagaku Tetsugaku 41 (1):79-94.
Stephen W. Ball (1992). Book Review:A Useful Inheritance: Evolutionary Aspects of the Theory of Knowledge Nicholas Rescher. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 59 (2):332-.
Stephen J. Boulter (2007). The “Evolutionary Argument” and the Metaphilosophy of Commonsense. Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):369-382.
S. Mark Heim (1996). Orientational Pluralism in Religion. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):201-215.
James Robert Brown (1985). Rescher's Evolutionary Epistemology. Philosophia 15 (3):287-300.
André Ariew (1998). Are Probabilities Necessary for Evolutionary Explanations? Biology and Philosophy 13 (2).
Graham Oppy (1991). On Rescher on Pascal's Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159-168.
Graham Oppy (1991). On Rescher on Pascal's Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
