Selmer Bringsjord, what robots can and can't be, studies in cognitive systems
Minds and Machines 7 (3):433-438 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSelmer Bringsjord & Ron Noel (2003). Real Robots and the Missing Thought-Experiment in the Chinese Room Dialectic. In John Preston & John Mark Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Selmer Bringsjord (1994). Precis of What Robots Can and Can't Be. Psycholoquy 5 (59).
Selmer Bringsjord (2007). Ethical Robots: The Future Can Heed Us. AI and Society 22 (4):539-550.
Selmer Bringsjord (2004). On Building Robot Persons: Response to Zlatev. Minds and Machines 14 (3):381-385.
E. Mendelson (2005). Selmer Bringsjord and Michael Zenzen. Superminds: People Harness Hypercomputation, and More. Studies in Cognitive Systems, Volume 29. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Pp. XXX + 339. Isbn 1-4020-1094-X. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):228-230.
Larry Hauser (2000). Ordinary Devices: Reply to Bringsjord's Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser. Minds and Machines 10 (1):115-117.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
