Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||What follows is an attempt to expose two covert “dogmas”—tendentious yet invisible assumptions—that underlie rationalist thought, both modern and contemporary. Though neither term is perfect, I will call these assumptions..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
P. Bloomfield (2007). Two Dogmas of Metaethics. Philosophical Studies 132 (3):439 - 466.
Alex John London (2007). Two Dogmas of Research Ethics and the Integrative Approach to Human-Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):99 – 116.
Alan Nelson (ed.) (2005). A Companion to Rationalism. Blackwell Pub..
Frank Keil, Two Dogmas of Conceptual Empiricism: Implications for Hybrid Models of the Structure of Knowledge.
James F. Harris (1973). Dogmas of “Two Dogmas”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):285-289.
Michael A. Rosenthal (2001). Spinoza's Dogmas of the Universal Faith and the Problem of Religion. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):53-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #13,733 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,948 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?