Two dogmas of rationalism
| Abstract | What follows is an attempt to expose two covert “dogmas”—tendentious yet invisible assumptions—that underlie rationalist thought, both modern and contemporary. Though neither term is perfect, I will call these assumptions.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesP. Bloomfield (2007). Two Dogmas of Metaethics. Philosophical Studies 132 (3):439 - 466.
Alex John London (2007). Two Dogmas of Research Ethics and the Integrative Approach to Human-Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):99 – 116.
Alan Nelson (ed.) (2005). A Companion to Rationalism. Blackwell Pub..
James F. Harris (1973). Dogmas of “Two Dogmas”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):285-289.
Michael A. Rosenthal (2001). Spinoza's Dogmas of the Universal Faith and the Problem of Religion. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):53-72.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads66 ( #13,616 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
