The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science 298 (22):1569-1579 (2002)
We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be proﬁtably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB)and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an inﬁnite range of expressions from a ﬁnite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Terry Regier (2011). The Learnability of Abstract Syntactic Principles. Cognition 118 (3):306-338.
Robert C. Berwick, Kazuo Okanoya, Gabriel J. L. Beckers & Johan J. Bolhuis (2011). Songs to Syntax: The Linguistics of Birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (3):113-121.
Morten H. Christiansen & Simon Kirby (2003). Language Evolution: Consensus and Controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7):300-307.
Marcello Barbieri (2010). On the Origin of Language. Biosemiotics 3 (2):201-223.
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Matthias Schlesewsky, Steven L. Small & Josef P. Rauschecker (2015). Neurobiological Roots of Language in Primate Audition: Common Computational Properties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (3):142-150.
Similar books and articles
Noam Chomsky, Marc Hauser, Fitch D. & W. Tecumseh (2005). Appendix. The Minimalist Program. Philosophical Explorations.
Michael Devitt (2006). Ignorance of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nirmalangshu Mukherji (2003). Is C Hl Linguistically Specific? Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):289 – 308.
Andreas Rogalewski, Caterina Breitenstein, Agnes Floel & Stefan Knecht (2004). Prosody as an Intermediary Evolutionary Stage Between a Manual Communication System and a Fully Developed Language Faculty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):521-522.
John M. Collins (2005). Faculty Disputes. Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Barry C. Smith (2008). What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Steven Pinker (2005). The Nature of the Language Faculty and its Implications for Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97 (2):211-225.
Ray Jackendoff (2005). The Nature of the Language Faculty and its Implications for Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97 (2):211-225.
Added to index2009-09-11
Total downloads51 ( #80,898 of 1,793,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #101,542 of 1,793,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?