David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 76 (3):395-402 (2012)
A possible event always seems to be more probable than an impossible event. Although this constraint, usually alluded to as regularity , is prima facie very attractive, it cannot hold for standard probabilities. Moreover, in a recent paper Timothy Williamson has challenged even the idea that regularity can be integrated into a comparative conception of probability by showing that the standard comparative axioms conflict with certain cases if regularity is assumed. In this note, we suggest that there is a natural weakening of the standard comparative axioms. It is shown that these axioms are consistent both with the regularity condition and with the essential feature of Williamson’s example
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ruth Weintraub (2008). How Probable is an Infinite Sequence of Heads? A Reply to Williamson. Analysis 68 (299):247–250.
Timothy Williamson (2007). How Probable Is an Infinite Sequence of Heads? Analysis 67 (3):173 - 180.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles G. Morgan (1999). Conditionals, Comparative Probability, and Triviality: The Conditional of Conditional Probability Cannot Be Represented in the Object Language. Topoi 18 (2):97-116.
Vieri Benci, Leon Horsten & Sylvia Wenmackers (2013). Non-Archimedean Probability. Milan Journal of Mathematics 81 (1):121-151.
Peter Milne (1987). Physical Probabilities. Synthese 73 (2):329 - 359.
Frank Döring (2000). Conditional Probability and Dutch Books. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):391-409.
Douglas N. Hoover (1980). A Note on Regularity. In Richard C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Patrick Suppes (2010). The Nature of Probability. Philosophical Studies 147 (1):89 - 102.
Kenny Easwaran (2014). Regularity and Hyperreal Credences. Philosophical Review 123 (1):1-41.
Paul Bartha & Christopher Hitchcock (1999). The Shooting-Room Paradox and Conditionalizing on Measurably Challenged Sets. Synthese 118 (3):403-437.
Aidan Lyon (2010). Philosophy of Probablilty. In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
Jonathan Schaffer (2000). Overlappings: Probability-Raising Without Causation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):40 – 46.
Peter Vallentyne (2000). Standard Decision Theory Corrected. Synthese 122 (3):261-290.
David Alm (2011). Equality and Comparative Justice. Inquiry 53 (4):309-325.
Paul K. Moser (1988). The Foundations of Epistemological Probability. Erkenntnis 28 (2):231 - 251.
Georges Dicker (2000). Regularity, Conditionality, and Asymmetry in Causation. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:129-138.
Added to index2011-07-16
Total downloads29 ( #64,368 of 1,101,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,246 of 1,101,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?