David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 76 (3):395-402 (2012)
A possible event always seems to be more probable than an impossible event. Although this constraint, usually alluded to as regularity , is prima facie very attractive, it cannot hold for standard probabilities. Moreover, in a recent paper Timothy Williamson has challenged even the idea that regularity can be integrated into a comparative conception of probability by showing that the standard comparative axioms conflict with certain cases if regularity is assumed. In this note, we suggest that there is a natural weakening of the standard comparative axioms. It is shown that these axioms are consistent both with the regularity condition and with the essential feature of Williamson’s example
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Timothy Williamson (2007). How Probable Is an Infinite Sequence of Heads? Analysis 67 (3):173 - 180.
Ruth Weintraub (2008). How Probable is an Infinite Sequence of Heads? A Reply to Williamson. Analysis 68 (299):247–250.
Citations of this work BETA
Sven Rosenkranz & Moritz Schulz (2015). Peer Disagreement: A Call for the Revision of Prior Probabilities. Dialectica 69 (4):551-586.
Similar books and articles
Charles G. Morgan (1999). Conditionals, Comparative Probability, and Triviality: The Conditional of Conditional Probability Cannot Be Represented in the Object Language. Topoi 18 (2):97-116.
Vieri Benci, Leon Horsten & Sylvia Wenmackers (2013). Non-Archimedean Probability. Milan Journal of Mathematics 81 (1):121-151.
Peter Milne (1987). Physical Probabilities. Synthese 73 (2):329 - 359.
Frank Döring (2000). Conditional Probability and Dutch Books. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):391-409.
Douglas N. Hoover (1980). A Note on Regularity. In Richard C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press
Patrick Suppes (2010). The Nature of Probability. Philosophical Studies 147 (1):89 - 102.
Kenny Easwaran (2014). Regularity and Hyperreal Credences. Philosophical Review 123 (1):1-41.
Paul Bartha & Christopher Hitchcock (1999). The Shooting-Room Paradox and Conditionalizing on Measurably Challenged Sets. Synthese 118 (3):403-437.
Aidan Lyon (2010). Philosophy of Probablilty. In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide. Wiley-Blackwell
Jonathan Schaffer (2000). Overlappings: Probability-Raising Without Causation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):40 – 46.
Peter Vallentyne (2000). Standard Decision Theory Corrected. Synthese 122 (3):261-290.
David Alm (2011). Equality and Comparative Justice. Inquiry 53 (4):309-325.
Paul K. Moser (1988). The Foundations of Epistemological Probability. Erkenntnis 28 (2):231 - 251.
Georges Dicker (2000). Regularity, Conditionality, and Asymmetry in Causation. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:129-138.
Added to index2011-07-16
Total downloads32 ( #121,414 of 1,793,282 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,793,282 )
How can I increase my downloads?