Advice for physicalists
Philosophical Studies 109 (1):17-52 (2002)
| Abstract | This paper engages with two compelling challenges to physicalism, each designed to show that the nature of experience is elusive from the standpoint of physical science. It is argued that the physicalist is ultimately well placed to meet both challenges | |||||||||
| Keywords | Essence Experience Metaphysics Pain Physicalism Property Science Chalmers, D | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlexander Rueger (2000). Robust Supervenience and Emergence. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):466-491.
Tim Crane (2005). Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Joseph Levine (2006). Color and Color Experience: Colors as Ways of Appearing. Dialectica 60 (3):269-282.
Patricia A. Ross (1999). The Limits of Physicalism. Philosophy of Science 66 (1):94-116.
Frank Jackson (1980). A Note on Physicalism and Heat. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (March):26-34.
Noa Latham (2003). What is Token Physicalism? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):270-290.
Philip Goff (2011). A PosterioriPhysicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):191-209.
Nic Damnjanovic (2012). Revelation and Physicalism. Dialectica 66 (1):69-91.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads103 ( #5,804 of 549,591 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,251 of 549,591 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
