Chopping Up Gunk
The Monist 87 (3):339-50 (2004)
| Abstract | We show that someone who believes in both gunk and the possibility of supertasks has to give up either a plausible principle about where gunk can be located, or plausible conservation principles. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCody Gilmore (forthcoming). Quasi-Supplementation, Plenitudinous Coincidentalism, and Gunk. In Robert Garcia (ed.), Substance: New Essays. Philosophia Verlag.
Franklin Mason (2000). How Not to Prove the Existence of 'Atomless Gunk'. Ratio 13 (2):175–185.
Hud Hudson (2007). Simples and Gunk. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):291–302.
Peter Forrest (2004). Grit or Gunk. The Monist 87 (3):351-370.
Daniel Nolan (2006). Stoic Gunk. Phronesis 51 (2):162-183.
Nikk Effingham (forthcoming). Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument. Philosophical Studies.
Daniel Nolan (2006). Stoic Gunk. Phronesis 51 (2):162-183.
John Hawthorne (2005). Gunk and Continuous Variation. The Monist 88 (4):441-465.
J. R. G. Williams (2006). Illusions of Gunk. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):493–513.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads63 ( #14,732 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,444 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
