Mathematical instrumentalism meets the conjunction objection

Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (4):363-397 (1996)
Scientific realists often appeal to some version of the conjunction objection to argue that scientific instrumentalism fails to do justice to the full empirical import of scientific theories. Whereas the conjunction objection provides a powerful critique of scientific instrumentalism, I will show that mathematical instnrunentalism escapes the conjunction objection unscathed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00249665
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Paul Benacerraf (1973). Mathematical Truth. Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Chris Mortensen (1998). On the Possibility of Science Without Numbers. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):182 – 197.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

47 ( #71,229 of 1,724,865 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #50,603 of 1,724,865 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.