Graduate studies at Western
Mind 109 (434):285-298 (2000)
|Abstract||ln "Possibilities and the Arguments for Origin Essentialism" Teresa Robertson (1998) contends that the best-known arguments in favour of origin essentialism can succeed only at the cost of violating modal common sense—by denying that any variation in constitution or process of assembly is possible. Focusing on the (Kripke-style) arguments of Nathan Salmon and Graeme Forbes, Robertson shows that both founder in the face of sophisticated Ship of Theseus style considerations. While Robertson is right that neither of the arguments is compelling as formulated, each can be modified to fend off her particular counterexamples; these modifications do not differ in kind from those already needed to deal with ordinary Theseus cases, requiring only a further narrowing of the sufficiency clause from which the necessity of origins is derived.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alice Drewery (2004). A Note on Science and Essentialism. Theoria 19 (3):311-320.
Sonia Roca-Royes & Ross Cameron (2006). Rohrbaugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin. Mind 115 (458):361-366.
George Bealer (1994). Mental Properties. Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):185-208.
Guy Rohrbaugh & Louis deRosset (2006). Prevention, Independence, and Origin. Mind 115 (458):375-386.
Teresa Robertson (2000). Essentialism: Origin and Order. Mind 109 (434):299-307.
Nic Damnjanovic (2009). Sperm, Eggs and Hunks: Biological Origins and Identity. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 24 (2):113-126.
Teresa Robertson & Graeme Forbes (2006). Does the New Route Reach its Destination? Mind 115 (458):367-374.
T. Robertson (1998). Possibilities and the Arguments for Origin Essentialism. Mind 107 (428):729-750.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #11,267 of 739,388 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,388 )
How can I increase my downloads?