David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 13 (1):77-100 (2007)
Philosophers have tended to dismiss John Stuart Mill’s claim that ‘all silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility’. I argue that Mill’s ‘infallibility claim’ is indeed open to many objections, but that, contrary to the consensus, those objections fail to defeat the anti-authoritarian thesis which lies at its core. I then argue that Mill’s consequentialist case for the liberty of thought and discussion is likewise capable of withstanding some familiar objections. My purpose is to suggest that Mill’s anti-authoritarianism and his faith in thought and discussion, when taken seriously, supply the basis for a ‘public interest’ account of ‘freedom of expression as the liberty of thought and discussion’ which is faithful to Mill in spirit, if not to the precise letter. I outline such an account, which – as I say in conclusion – can serve as a valuable safeguard against ad hoc, reactive legislation, and the demands of a spurious communitarianism.
|Keywords||free speech freedom of expression thought and discussion J. S. Mill: On Liberty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alexander Brown (2008). The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: A Millian Response. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.
Similar books and articles
Alan E. Fuchs (2001). Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
John Skorupski (ed.) (1998). The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge University Press.
Deni Elliott (2007). Getting Mill Right. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):100 – 112.
Ted Honderich (1967). Mill on Liberty. Inquiry 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
H. J. McCloskey (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I). Inquiry 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Maria Morales (2007). Rational Freedom in John Stuart Mill's Feminism. In Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.), J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press
Elisabeth A. Lloyd (1997). Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):407.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Chin-Liew Ten (2002). Was Mill a Liberal? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
D. H. Monro (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II). Inquiry 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads98 ( #41,640 of 1,907,887 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,049 of 1,907,887 )
How can I increase my downloads?