David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2):141-168 (2012)
This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I identify four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian E. Butler (2010). Sen's The Idea of Justice: Back to the (Pragmatic) Future. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):219-229.
Marilyn Friedman (1990). Does Sommers Like Women?: More on Liberalism, Gender Hierarchy, and Scarlett O'Hara. Journal of Social Philosophy 21 (2-3):75-90.
Robert E. Goodin & David Parker (2000). Symposium on Martha Nussbaum's Political Philosophy. Ethics 111 (1):5-7.
Diana T. Meyers (1987). Personal Autonomy and the Paradox of Feminine Socialization. Journal of Philosophy 84 (11):619-628.
Judy D. Whipps (2010). Examining Addams's Democratic Theory Through a Postcolonial Feminist Lens. In Maurice Hamington (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams. Pennsylvania State University Press. 275.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul D. Forster (2000). Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Roger Paden (1997). Consumerism, the Procedural Republic, and the Unencumbered Self. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):33-40.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Colin Koopman (2007). Language is a Form of Experience: Reconciling Classical Pragmatism and Neopragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):694 - 727.
Roger Paden (1996). Liberalism and Consumerism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (4):14-19.
H. G. Callaway (1994). Liberalism and the Moral Significance of Individualism. Reason Papers 19 (Fall):13-29.
Ben Colburn (2010). Autonomy and Liberalism. Routledge.
Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
Kevin Vallier (2012). Liberalism, Religion And Integrity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
Struan Jacobs (1990). Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism. Critical Review 4 (3):365-375.
David Rondel (2009). Liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Alan Ryan (2007). Newer Than What? Older Than What? Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):1-15.
Jon Mahoney (2004). Public Reason and the Moral Foundation of Liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):311-331.
Eddy Souffrant (2002). Reflections on Transnationalism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (2):19-29.
Added to index2012-09-12
Total downloads39 ( #47,523 of 1,102,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #8,817 of 1,102,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?