Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Writers presenting Buddhism to European and North American audiences have often availed themselves of philosophical terminology from modern traditions to convey presumably less familiar ideas coming from various classical and medieval Asian settings. Since the Buddha and many philosophers who developed his ideas seem to have stressed the importance of practice over theory, Buddhism is frequently described as practical or even pragmatic in its orientation. Since there have been few unpleasant clashes between traditional Buddhist beliefs and the findings of modern science, and nothing that would compare in importance to the confrontations between Darwinians and Creationists, many Buddhist apologists have been able to get away with characterizing theirs as a religion that is scientific in spirit; many Buddhists, especially Therav ¯.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
R. Panth (ed.) (2001). Nālandā-- Buddhism and the World: Golden Jubilee Volume. Nava Nalanda Mahavihara.
Kōgen Mizuno (1996). Essentials of Buddhism: Basic Terminology and Concepts of Buddhist Philosophy and Practice. Kōsei Pub..
Roy W. Perrett (2000). Buddhism, Abortion and the Middle Way. Asian Philosophy 10 (2):101 – 114.
Basil J. deSilva (2008). Our Mentality Through the Ages, and Then to Nibbana: The Path of Evolution. Main Distributors, Buddhist Cultural Centre.
Peter Harrison (2010). A Scientific Buddhism? Zygon 45 (4):861-869.
Colette Sciberras (2008). Buddhism and Speciesism: On the Misapplication of Western Concepts to Buddhist Beliefs. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 15:215-240.
Winston L. King (2001). In the Hope of Nibb⁻Ana: The Ethics of Therav⁻Ada Buddhism. Pariyatti Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,354 of 755,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,366 of 755,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?