Forced supererogation and deontological restrictions
Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4) (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Supererogation. In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism.
Gregory Mellema (1996). Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation? Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Robert Shaver (2007). Contractualism and Restrictions. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):293 - 299.
David Alm (2009). Deontological Restrictions and the Good/Bad Asymmetry. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):464-481.
Alec Walen (1995). Doing, Allowing, and Disabling: Some Principles Governing Deontological Restrictions. Philosophical Studies 80 (2):183 - 215.
David Heyd (1982). Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
David Alm (2008). Deontological Restrictions and the Self/Other Asymmetry. Noûs 42 (4):642-672.
Roderick M. Chisholm & Ernest Sosa (1966). Intrinsic Preferability and the Problem of Supererogation. Synthese 16 (3-4):321 - 331.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads33 ( #36,617 of 549,131 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,131 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
