David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 18 (1):55-63 (1996)
A major problem that skeptical critics have identified with the project of environmental ethics as it is often conceived is that it involves the search for a criterion of moral considerability, and some claim that this search has not only been unsuccessful, but it is in principle mistaken. Birch has recently argued that this whole problem can be avoided through his proposal of universal consideration in a “root sense,” which applies to all beings, with no exceptions marked by any of the criteria proposed by others. I argue that the strengths of this proposal are its openness to new value discoveries and its focus on agents’ practices. Its flaw is its failure to account convincingly for how values are ever formulated or obligations generated. Hence, it does not represent a viable alternative to the approach he rejects. However, rather than return to that approach, I suggest that Birch’s own line of argument could be developed more consistently if, from his starting point of “deontic experience,” one were to develop an explicitly deontological ethic that focuses more decisively on moral consideration as opposed to moral considerability
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Benjamin Hale (2011). Moral Considerability: Deontological, Not Metaphysical. Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):37-62.
James McBain (2004). Moral Callings and the Decision to Have Children – A Response to Mitchell. Contemporary Philosophy 2004 (25):3&4.
W. Murray Hunt (1980). Are Mere Things Morally Considerable? Environmental Ethics 2 (1):59-65.
Christopher Knapp (2009). Species Inegalitarianism as a Matter of Principle. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):174-189.
Michael Smith (2011). Deontological Moral Obligations and Non-Welfarist Agent-Relative Values. Ratio 24 (4):351-363.
Benjamin Hale (2006). The Moral Considerability of Invasive Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4):337-366.
Anthony Weston (1998). Universal Consideration as an Originary Practice. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):279-289.
Jim Cheney (1998). Universal Consideration: An Epistemological Map of the Terrain. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):265-277.
Thomas H. Birch (1993). Moral Considerability and Universal Consideration. Environmental Ethics 15 (4):313-332.
Jim Cheney (1998). Universal Consideration. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):265-277.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #152,329 of 1,100,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #33,348 of 1,100,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?