Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):241-255 (2009)
|Abstract||Here I defend response moralism, the view that some emotional responses to fi ctions are morally right, and others morally wrong, from the objection that responses to merely fi ctional characters and events cannot be morally evaluated. I defend the view that emotional responses to fi ctions can be morally evaluated only to the extent that said responses are responses to real people and events.|
|Keywords||Ethical Criticism Genre|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edwin Curley (1988). Cavell and the Comedy of Remarriage. Philosophy Research Archives 14:581-603.
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2010). New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.
Gerald McKenny (2005). Genre and Persuasion in Religious Ethics: An Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (3):397 - 407.
Aaron Smuts (2011). Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Aaron Smuts (2013). The Salacious and the Satirical: In Defense of Symmetric Comic Moralism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (4):45-62.
Alessandro Giovannelli (2007). The Ethical Criticism of Art: A New Mapping of the Territory. Philosophia 35 (2):117-127.
Aaron Smuts (2010). The Ethics of Humor: Can Your Sense of Humor Be Wrong? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):333-47.
Bridget Clarke (2010). Virtue and Disagreement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):273 - 291.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,917 of 739,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,788 )
How can I increase my downloads?