David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 9 (3):205-223 (2012)
This paper concerns would-be necessary connections between doxastic attitudes about the epistemic statuses of your doxastic attitudes, or , and the epistemic statuses of those doxastic attitudes. I will argue that, in some situations, it can be reasonable for a person to believe p and to suspend judgment about whether believing p is reasonable for her. This will set the stage for an account of the virtue of intellectual humility, on which humility is a matter of your higher-order epistemic attitudes. Recent discussions in the epistemology of disagreement have assumed that the question of the proper response to disagreement about p concerns whether you ought to change your doxastic attitude towards p. My conclusion here suggests an alternative approach, on which the question of the proper response to disagreement about p concerns the proper doxastic attitude to adopt concerning the epistemic status of your doxastic attitude towards p
|Keywords||agnosticism epistemic akrasia higher-order doubts or evidence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sophie Horowitz (2014). Epistemic Akrasia. Noûs 48 (4):718-744.
Similar books and articles
Matthias Steup (2000). Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology. Acta Analytica 15 (1):25-56.
Teresa Marques (2014). Doxastic Disagreement. Erkenntnis 79 (1):121-142.
Anthony Robert Booth (2012). All Things Considered Duties to Believe. Synthese 187 (2):509-517.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2006). Doxastic Decisions and Controlling Belief. Acta Analytica 21 (1):102-114.
Jonathan Matheson (2011). The Case for Rational Uniqueness. Logic and Episteme 2 (3):359-373.
Guy Axtell (2012). (More) Springs of My Discontent. Logos and Episteme (1):131-137.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2005). An Essay on Doxastic Agency. Dissertation, University of Rochester
Jonathan Matheson (2009). Conciliatory Views of Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 6 (3):269-279.
Allan Hazlett (forthcoming). Expressivism and Convention-Relativism About Epistemic Discourse. In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Matthew Chrisman (2008). Ought to Believe. Journal of Philosophy 105 (7):346-370.
Edward Hinchman (2012). Reflection, Disagreement, and Context. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):95.
Scott Stapleford (2012). Epistemic Duties and Failure to Understand One's Evidence. Principia 16 (1):147-177.
James Kraft (2006). Religious Tolerance Through Religious Diversity and Epistemic Humility. Sophia 45 (2):101-116.
Tom Stoneham (1998). On Believing That I Am Thinking. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):125-44.
Added to index2011-03-30
Total downloads302 ( #1,335 of 1,139,990 )
Recent downloads (6 months)42 ( #3,142 of 1,139,990 )
How can I increase my downloads?