David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 19 (2):191–198 (2006)
I consider an objection to Lewisian modal realism: the view entails that there are a great many real evils that we ought to care about, but in fact we shouldn’t care about these evils. I reply on behalf of the modal realist – we should and do care about possible evils, and this is shown in our reactions to fictions about evils, which (plausibly, for the modal realist) are understood as making certain possible evils salient.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brice R. Wachterhauser (1985). The Problem of Evil and Moral Scepticism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17 (3):167 - 174.
David Woodruff (2005). What Probability Arguments Show. Philo 8 (2):63-83.
Claudia Card (2010). Confronting Evils: Terrorism, Torture, Genocide. Cambridge University Press.
Claudia Card (2002). The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford University Press.
Robert Bass (2011). Many Inscrutable Evils. Ars Disputandi 11:118-132.
Dennis Earl (2011). Divine Intimacy and the Problem of Horrendous Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):17-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #38,344 of 1,102,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,222 of 1,102,093 )
How can I increase my downloads?