David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):e5-e5 (2004)
<span class='Hi'>Designer</span> <span class='Hi'>babies</span> are often presented in the popular media as a kind of apocalyptical spectre of things to come in a brave new world where reproduction is the province of white coated scientists and potential parents in pursuit of trophy children. In this realm physical, intellectual, and social perfection is sought through the manipulation of genes and selection of favoured traits and attributes to the detriment of individuals who cannot compete and of society more generally through the loss of natural selection. It is therefore a pleasure to discover a short readable book that sets out the discussion and its many nuances in concise and accurate terms that will be accessible to all and should help to dispel some of these science fiction myths through scholarly debate.This volume is part of a collection of books under the title Debating Matters that sprang out of a series of public debates organised by the Institute of Ideas. The conferences were intended to reinvigorate debate and the contestation of ideas and contemporary issues the Institute regards as “too frequently sidelined”. The arguments are presented by an authoritative who’s who of commentators who offer their own insightful readings of various aspects of the debate. Each essayist confirms the fact that the term “<span class='Hi'>designer</span> <span class='Hi'>babies</span>” is an inaccurate reflection of the current ability of science to actively fashion children with selected characteristics, and as a result ….
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tuija Takala (2007). Designer Babies and Treating People as a Means. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:245-249.
Mike Williams (2003). Designer Babies. Philosophy Now 41:43-43.
Ian Hunt (1999). Designer Babies. Professional Ethics 7 (3/4):67-83.
Stephen Wilkinson (2005). Designer Babies', Instrumentalisation and the Child's Right to an Open Future. In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan
John D. Grad (1984). The Professional Advertiser: How Do We Draw the Line (If There Is a Line)? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 12 (5):199-203.
Herbert W. Simons (1992). How to Draw the Line Between Metaphoric Use and Abuse: Are Howe and Lyne Out of Line on Sociobiology? Social Epistemology 6 (2):215 – 218.
Kyle Scott (2010). Blood Matters: From Inherited Illness to Designer Babies, How the World and I Found Ourselves in the Future of the Gene. Masha Gessen. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2008. 336 Pages. Hardback. ISBN 978-0151013623. RRP: £18.99. [REVIEW] Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):127-129.
Mark I. Vuletic (2000). Destined for Greatness. Philo 3 (2):89-103.
Joseph Agassi (1964). Variations on the Liar's Paradox. Studia Logica 15 (1):237 - 238.
Richard D. Kortum (2004). The Very Idea of Design: What God Couldn't Do. Religious Studies 40 (1):81-96.
Bruce Lloyd (1993). Corruption: Where to Draw the Line? Business Ethics 2 (2):94–96.
Elizabeth Harman (2003). The Potentiality Problem. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads62 ( #66,741 of 1,792,083 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #80,484 of 1,792,083 )
How can I increase my downloads?