David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 53 (3):243-270 (2008)
Aristotle's claim that natural slaves do not possess autonomous rationality (Pol. 1.5, 1254b20-23) cannot plausibly be interpreted in an unrestricted sense, since this would conflict with what Aristotle knew about non-Greek societies. Aristotle's argument requires only a lack of autonomous practical rationality. An impairment of the capacity for integrated practical deliberation, resulting from an environmentally induced excess or deficiency in thumos (Pol. 7.7, 1327b18-31), would be sufficient to make natural slaves incapable of eudaimonia without being obtrusively implausible relative to what Aristotle is likely to have believed about non-Greeks. Since Aristotle seems to have believed that the existence of people who can be enslaved without injustice is a hypothetical necessity, if those capable oí eudaimonia are to achieve it, the existence of natural slaves has implications for our understanding of Aristotle's natural teleology
|Keywords||THUMOS DELIBERATION SLAVERY TELEOLOGY ARISTOTLE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Malcolm Heath (2008). Aristotle on Natural Slavery. Phronesis 53 (3):243 - 270.
Robert L. Gallagher (2011). Aristotle on Eidei Diapherontoi. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):363 - 384.
Adriel M. Trott (2013). Rule in Turn. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):301-311.
Simon Roberts-Thomson (2008). An Explanation of the Injustice of Slavery. Res Publica 14 (2):69-82.
Robert Mayhew (1997). Part and Whole in Aristotle's Political Philosophy. Journal of Ethics 1 (4):325-340.
Mariska Leunissen (2010). Aristotle's Syllogistic Model of Knowledge and the Biological Sciences: Demonstrating Natural Processes. Apeiron 43 (2-3):31-60.
Ariela J. Gross, When is the Time of Slavery? The History and Politics of Slavery in Contemporary Legal Argument.
Jane Duran (2010). Slavery in Global Context. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):61-69.
Eugene Garver (2006). Aristotle and the Will to Power. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (2):74-83.
Mariska Leunissen (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Anthony Preus (1993). Aristotle On Slavery. Philosophical Inquiry 15 (3-4):33-47.
Maurice S. Lee (2005). Slavery, Philosophy, and American Literature, 1830-1860. Cambridge University Press.
Monte Ransome Johnson (2005). Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford University Press.
Wayne Ambler (1987). Aristotle on Nature and Politics: The Case of Slavery. Political Theory 15 (3):390-410.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads16 ( #113,922 of 1,410,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,015 of 1,410,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?