Graduate studies at Western
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:293- (2002)
|Abstract||The conceptual and technical difficulties involved in creating a quantum theory of gravity have led some physicists to question, and even in some cases to deny, the reality of time. More surprisingly, this denial has found a sympathetic audience among certain philosophers of physics. What should we make of these wild ideas? Does it even make sense to deny the reality of time? In fact physical science has been chipping away at common sense aspects of time ever since its inception. Section 1 offers a brief survey of the demolition process. Section 2 distinguishes a tempered from an extremely radical form that a denial of time might take, and argues that extreme radicalism is empirically self-refuting. Section 3 begins an investigation of the prospects for tempered radicalism in a timeless theory of quantum gravity|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Frederick Savitt (ed.) (1995). Time's Arrows Today: Recent Physical and Philosophical Work on the Direction of Time. Cambridge University Press.
Bradley Monton (2010). Mctaggart and Modern Physics. Philosophia 38 (2):257-264.
Michael J. Raven (2011). Can Time Pass at the Rate of 1 Second Per Second? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):459 - 465.
Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham (2001). Spacetime and the Philosophical Challenge of Quantum Gravity. In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Panck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Eva T. H. Brann (1999/2001). What, Then, is Time? Rowman & Littlefield.
Gordon Belot, Whatever is Never and Nowhere is Not: Space, Time, and Ontology in Classical and Quantum Gravity.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads131 ( #4,563 of 739,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #2,302 of 739,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?