Philosophy of Science 64 (1):18-41 (1997)
|Abstract||At first sight the Aharonov-Bohm effect appears nonlocal, though not in the way EPR/Bell correlations are generally acknowledged to be nonlocal. This paper applies an analysis of nonlocality to the Aharonov-Bohm effect to show that its peculiarities may be blamed either on a failure of a principle of local action or on a failure of a principle of separability. Different interpretations of quantum mechanics disagree on how blame should be allocated. The parallel between the Aharonov-Bohm effect and violations of Bell inequalities turns out to be so close that a balanced assessment of the nature and significance of quantum nonlocality requires a detailed study of both effects|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Healey (2004). Gauge Theories and Holisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):619-642.
James Mattingly (2007). Classical Fields and Quantum Time-Evolution in the Aharonov–Bohm Effect. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (4):888-905.
Chuang Liu (1994). The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Reality of Wave Packets. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):977-1000.
Richard Healey (1999). Quantum Analogies: A Reply to Maudlin. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):440-447.
Gordon Belot (1998). Understanding Electromagnetism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):531-555.
Stephen Leeds (1999). Gauges: Aharonov, Bohm, Yang, Healey. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):606-627.
Tim Maudlin (1998). Healey on the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):361-368.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,640 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,982 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?