Original sin or original sinfulness? A comment
Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69 (2013)
| Abstract | My purpose is to defend Augustine's doctrine of original sin against Joseph Fitzpatrick in his series of articles in New Blackfriars (July 2009–Jan 2010). I begin by arguing that Fitzpatrick's criticisms of it as psychologically inadequate fail because they do not take seriously enough the metaphysical structure of this doctrine, viz, creation from nothing. The second part begins with a critique of Fitzpatrick's interpretation of Genesis 3 and continues with a critical analysis of his proposed alternative to Augustine on original sin (‘original sinfulness’) with reference to the scriptural passages he cites in its support. The conclusion I reach is that ‘original sinfulness’ is not an acceptable biblical hermeneutic. In the third section, I discuss Fitzpatrick's concept of ‘prototypical action’ and, using recent work of Carol Harrison on Augustine's early theological writings, I argue that, far from being incompatible with Augustine's theology of original sin, as Fitzpatrick maintains, this concept enables us to understand Augustine's position in a way that overcomes Fitzpatrick's objections to it | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Michael Rea (2007). The Metaphysics of Original Sin. In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Persons: Human and Divine.
W. Paul Franks (2012). Original Sin and a Broad Free Will Defense. Philosophia Christi 14 (2):353–371.
Geoffrey Rees (2003). The Anxiety of Inheritance: Reinhold Niebuhr and the Literal Truth of Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):75 - 99.
James Stillwaggon (forthcoming). The Problem of Propagation: Original Sin as Inherited Discourse. Studies in Philosophy and Education:1-13.
John T. Mullen (2007). Can Evolutionary Psychology Confirm Original Sin? Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):268-283.
Jesse Couenhoven (2005). St. Augustine's Doctrine of Original Sin. Augustinian Studies 36 (2):359-396.
James Wetzel (1995). Moral Personality, Perversity, and Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):3 - 25.
Russell J. De Simone (1980). Modern Research on the Sources of Saint Augustine's Doctrine of Original Sin. Augustinian Studies 11:205-227.
Gilbert Meilaender (1995). The First and the Second Adam: Reflections on James Wetzel's Reformulation of a Doctrine. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):27 - 33.
Peter King (2007). Damaged Goods. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):247-267.
Peter King (2007). Damaged Goods. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):247-267.
W. M. Spellman (1988). John Locke and the Problem of Depravity. Clarendon Press.
William J. O'Brien (1974). Toward Understanding Original Sin in Augustine's "Confessions". Thought 49 (4):436-446.
Annika Thiem (2010). Specters of Sin and Salvation. Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):117-138.
Paul J. Weithman (1992). Augustine and Aquinas on Original Sin and the Function of Political Authority. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (3):353-376.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-26Total downloads12 ( #94,544 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |

