Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 68 (4):432-455 (2001)
|Abstract||Classically, a gauge potential was merely a convenient device for generating a corresponding gauge field. Quantum-mechanically, a gauge potential lays claim to independent status as a further feature of the physical situation. But whether this is a local or a global feature is not made any clearer by the variety of mathematical structures used to represent it. I argue that in the theory of electromagnetism (or a non-Abelian generalization) that describes quantum particles subject to a classical interaction, the gauge potential is best understood as a feature of the physical situation whose global character is most naturally represented by the holonomies of closed curves in space-time.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Katherine Brading & Harvey R. Brown (2004). Are Gauge Symmetry Transformations Observable? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):645-665.
Richard Healey (2007). Gauging What's Real. Oxford University Press.
John Earman (2002). Gauge Matters. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S209--20.
Richard Healey (2010). Gauge Symmetry and the Theta Vacuum. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer.
Richard Healey (2009). Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories. OUP Oxford.
Holger Lyre (2001). The Principles of Gauging. Philosophy of Science 68 (3):S371-S381.
Richard Healey (2004). Gauge Theories and Holisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):619-642.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #20,344 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #2,302 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?