David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 44 (1):48-62 (2013)
Atomistic metaphysics motivated an explanatory strategy which science has pursued with great success since the scientific revolution. By decomposing matter into its atomic and subatomic parts physics gave us powerful explanations and accurate predictions as well as providing a unifying framework for the rest of science. The success of the decompositional strategy has encouraged a widespread conviction that the physical world forms a compositional hierarchy that physics and other sciences are progressively articulating. But this conviction does not stand up to a closer examination of how physics has treated composition, as a variety of case studies will show
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Terence E. Horgan (1993). From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind 102 (408):555-86.
Achille C. Varzi, Mereology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1998). The Statue and the Clay. Noûs 32 (2):149-173.
Doreen Fraser (2008). The Fate of 'Particles' in Quantum Field Theories with Interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (4):841-859.
David Baker (2009). Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):585-609.
Citations of this work BETA
L. A. Paul (2012). Building the World From its Fundamental Constituents. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):221-256.
Mauro Dorato (2015). Laws of Nature and the Reality of the Wave Function. Synthese 192 (10):3179-3201.
Kerry McKenzie (forthcoming). Relativities of Fundamentality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
Similar books and articles
Jessica M. Wilson (2006). On Characterizing the Physical. Philosophical Studies 131 (1):61-99.
Agustin Vicente (2011). Current Physics and 'the Physical'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):393-416.
Nicholas Maxwell (2002). Science and Meaning. The Philosophers' Magazine (18):15-16.
Katherine Hawley (2006). Principles of Composition and Criteria of Identity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):481 – 493.
Agustín Vicente (2006). On the Causal Completeness of Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):149 – 171.
John Polkinghorne (2003). Physics and Metaphysics in a Trinitarian Perspective. Theology and Science 1 (1):33-49.
Mauro Dorato (forthcoming). How to Combine and Not to Combine Physics and Metaphysics. In Dennis Dieks & Vassili Karakostas (eds.), Proceedings of the EPSA 2011.
István Aranyosi (2003). Physical Constituents of Qualia. Philosophical Studies 116 (2):103-131.
Richard Noakes (2008). The 'World of the Infinitely Little': Connecting Physical and Psychical Realities Circa 1900. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (3):323-334.
Kristina Rolin (1999). Can Gender Ideologies Influence the Practice of the Physical Sciences? Perspectives on Science 7 (4):510-533.
Kris McDaniel (2010). Composition as Identity Does Not Entail Universalism. Erkenntnis 73 (1):97-100.
Wilfrid S. Sellars (1981). Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process, III: Is Consciousness Physical? The Monist 64 (January):66-90.
Added to index2011-05-22
Total downloads136 ( #27,210 of 1,796,302 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #97,741 of 1,796,302 )
How can I increase my downloads?