Religious Studies 47:345–57 (2011)
|Abstract||The most famous objection to the ontological argument is given in Kant’s dictum that existence is not a real predicate. But it is not obvious how this slogan is supposed to relate to the ontological argument. Some, most notably Alvin Plantinga, have even judged Kant’s dictum to be totally irrelevant to Anselm’s version of the ontological argument. In this paper, I argue, against Plantinga and others, that Kant’s claim is indeed relevant to Anselm’s argument, in the straightforward sense that if the claim is true, then Anselm’s argument is unsound.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean-Luc Marion (1992). Is the Ontological Argument Ontological? The Argument According to Anselm and its Metaphysical Interpretation According to Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):201-218.
Georges Dicker (1988). A Refutation of Rowe's Critique of Anselm's Ontological Argument. Faith and Philosophy 5 (2):193-202.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Peter Millican (2004). The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm's Argument. Mind 113 (451):437-476.
Graham Oppy (2008). The Ontological Argument. In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Blackwell Pub..
Yujin Nagasawa (2007). Millican on the Ontological Argument. Mind 116 (464):1027 - 1039.
Hugh S. Chandler (1993). Some Ontological Arguments. Faith and Philosophy 10 (Jan):18-180.
Added to index2010-04-08
Total downloads146 ( #2,720 of 549,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #4,642 of 549,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?