David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41 (1998)
Even though the concept of a 'validity claim' is central to Habermas's theory of communicative action, he has never given a precise definition of the term. He has stated only that truth is a type of validity claim, and that rightness and sincerity are analogous to truth. This paper explores the basis of this analogy, arguing that rightness and sincerity must share at least two characteristics with the truth predicate: each must be the designated value in an appropriate system of logic, and each must serve as the 'central notion' in a theory of meaning for some corresponding class of speech acts. It is these two characteristics that establish the internal connec tion between understanding and justification that Habermas's more general project requires. However, there is an unnoticed tension between these two characteristics, since the relative autonomy of linguistic meaning from specific contexts of use appears to require that speech acts be governed by a uniform logic, and thus by a single validity claim. Key Words: communicative action - Habermas - pragmatics - speech act theory - truth - validity claim.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James Gordon Finlayson (2005). Habermas's Moral Cognitivism and the Frege-Geach Challenge. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):319–344.
Similar books and articles
Ali Mesbah, Religion, Rationality, and Language : A Critical Analysis of Jürgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
Lambert Zuidervaart (2002). Art, Truth and Vocation: Validity and Disclosure in Heidegger's Anti-Aesthetics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):153-172.
Jari I. Niemi (2005). Habermas and Validity Claims. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):227 – 244.
Maciej Witek (2005). Truth and Conversation. Philosophica 75:103-135.
Barbara Fultner (2002). Inferentialism and Communicative Action: Robust Conceptions of Intersubjectivity. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):121 - 131.
Michael D. Barber (2004). A Moment of Unconditional Validity? Schutz and the Habermas/Rorty Debate. Human Studies 27 (1):51-67.
Barbara Fultner (1996). The Redemption of Truth: Idealization, Acceptability and Fallibilism in Habermas' Theory of Meaning. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (2):233 – 251.
Andrea Iacona (2010). Validity and Interpretation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):247-264.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #59,383 of 1,724,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)34 ( #31,938 of 1,724,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?