David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 17 (1-4):105 – 111 (1974)
B. F. Skinner has argued that those who are serious about ending war, pollution, etc., must face the fact that the received methods of changing behavior have proved ineffective. According to Skinner, we must replace 'weak' methods of control such as control via praise and blame and control via Rousseau's 'natural contingencies of things' with Skinner's 'strong' methods of control. It is argued that Skinner's case for the continued ineffectiveness of such methods of control rests on the unargued assumption that we are stuck with the highly centralized forms of social organization that characterize present-day advanced societies, forms that place barriers between man and man and between man and nature. Drawing on the anarchist tradition in political thought, it is argued that a radical decentralization — which cannot be dismissed as Utopian — would bring a new effectiveness to what Skinner dismisses as 'weak' forms of control.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
B. F. Skinner (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Penguin Books.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Judith L. Scharff (1999). Skinner's Reinforcement Theory: A Heideggerian Assessment of Its Empirical Success and Philosophical Failure. Behavior and Philosophy 27 (1):1 - 17.
Brian V. Hill (1972). Behavior, Learning and Control: Some Philosophical Difficulties in the Writings of B. F. Skinner. Educational Theory 22 (2):230-241.
Roy A. Moxley (1996). The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Peter R. Killeen (2004). Minding Behavior. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):125-147.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
Joseph J. Pear (2002). Does the New Paradigm in Ape-Language Research Ape Behaviorism? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):635-636.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Determinism to Random Variation. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (1):3 - 28.
Carl G. Hedman (1975). Toward a Spinozistic Modification of Skinner's Theory of Man. Inquiry 18 (3):325 – 335.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads5 ( #505,417 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,527 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?