Incommensurability and the "omission" in Gibson's theory: A second reply to Heil

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,817
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Howard Sankey (1998). Taxonomic Incommensurability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):7 – 16.
Edward S. Reed & Rebecca K. Jones (1982). Perception and Cognition: A Final Reply to Heil. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (2):223–224.
John Heil (1979). What Gibson's Missing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 9 (3):265–269.
John Heil (1981). Gibsonian Sins of Omission. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):307–311.
Stephen Wilcox & Stuart Katz (1981). What Gibson Isn't Missing After All: A Reply to Heil. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):313–317.
Harry Heft (1980). What Heil is Missing in Gibson: A Reply. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 10 (3):187–193.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

3 ( #304,116 of 1,099,913 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.