Excuses and '"Ought" Implies "Can"'

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):449 - 462 (1975)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Marcia Baron (2006). Excuses, Excuses. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21-39.
    Robert Franck & J. -L. Austin (1967). Les Excuses (« A Plea for Excuses »). Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 72 (4):414 - 445.
    François Tanguay-Renaud (forthcoming). Puzzling About State Excuses as an Instance of Group Excuses. In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall & V. Tadros (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
    Shyam Ranganathan (2010). Does Kant Hold That Ought Implies Can? In J. Sharma A. Raguramaraju (ed.), Grounding Morality. Routledge.
    John Austin (1956). A Plea for Excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.
    Elinor Mason (2003). Consequentialism and the "Ought Implies Can" Principle. American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4):319 - 331.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    7 ( #133,479 of 549,086 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #25,722 of 549,086 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums