Environmental Ethics 1 (4):321-327 (1979)
|Abstract||The destructive tension between human needs and environmental conservation arises from flaws in our political and economic structures. Oppression of people and devastation of nature go hand in hand, and the root of both these evils is the denial of otherness. The ecology movement is basically a movement of liberation, and is in league, de jure and de facto, with other liberation movements, since it seeks to promote the rights ofthe nonhuman world. In this context, subjugation of the Other is immoral in all forms and ultimately suicidal. Recognition of the value of nonhuman nature doesn’t preclude a rational use of it, but requires something analogous to the primitive custom of apologizing to the spirits of prey, i.e., a mixture of religious respect and common sense. Awareness of the beauty and power of nature, like awareness ofthe injured rights of our fellow humans, creates a revolutionary moral imperative to change the life of our society|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mick Smith (1999). To Speak of Trees: Social Constructivism, Environmental Values, and the Future of Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):359-376.
Paul Robbins (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell Pub..
Roderick P. Neumann (2005). Making Political Ecology. Distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press.
Jurriaan De Haan (2001). The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267 - 284.
Charles Birch (1981). The Liberation of Life: From the Cell to the Community. Cambridge University Press.
Arne Naess (1984). A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,081 of 722,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?