David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):21-41 (2007)
This article deals with the question of Suárez’s conception of being, which prima facie seems to oscillate between a Scotistic univocal conception anda conception of being according to the analogy of intrinsic attribution. The paper intends to show that Suárez’s doctrine can in no way be interpreted as representative of the univocal conception, and proceeds in six steps. First, it highlights the importance of the Uncommon Doctor’s theory of the unity of both the formal and the objective concepts of being. In the second part, the paper asks how the concept of being can, without any internal differentiation and structure, give rise to the different relations that it has to the natures subordinated to it. In the second and the third parts, this question receives an answer against the backgroundof Suárez’s critique of Scotus’s conception, and with the help of his theory of the radical intimate transcendence of being. In the fourth section, there follows anexposition of Suárez’s doctrine on the explication of the concept of being. The fifth section offers a brief presentation of the significance of esse for ratio entis. Inthe last section, the author places his interpretation in the general context of the Metaphysical Disputation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Scientific Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 74 (1):48-68.
Mauricio Suárez (2004). An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):767-779.
David Svoboda (2007). Francisco Suárez on the Addition of the One to Being and the Priority of the One Over the Many. Studia Neoaristotelica 4 (2):158-172.
Marleen Rozemond (2012). Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez's Soul. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. OUP Oxford
Daniel Heider (2009). The Nature of Suárez's Metaphysics: Disputationes Metaphysicae and Their Main Systematic Strains. Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (1):99-110.
Daniel Schwartz (2008). Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation. Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Stephen D. Dumont (1992). Transcendental Being: Scotus and Scotists. Topoi 11 (2):135-148.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1992). Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals. Topoi 11 (2):121-133.
Daniel Schwartz (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #174,711 of 1,934,423 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,801 of 1,934,423 )
How can I increase my downloads?