Molecular biology vs. organicism: The enduring dispute between mechanism and vitalism
Synthese 20 (2):238 - 253 (1969)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTheodore M. Brown (1974). From Mechanism to Vitalism in Eighteenth-Century English Physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 7 (2):179 - 216.
Michael J. Denton, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel & Michael Legge (2013). Cells as Irreducible Wholes: The Failure of Mechanism and the Possibility of an Organicist Revival. Biology and Philosophy 28 (1):31-52.
Rainer Schubert-Soldern (1962). Mechanism and Vitalism. Notre Dame, Ind.,University of Notre Dame Press.
Geert Jan M. Klerk (1979). Mechanism and Vitalism. A History of the Controversy. Acta Biotheoretica 28 (1).
Hilde Hein (1968). Mechanism, Vitalism, and Biopoesis. World Futures 6 (3):3-56.
Donna Jeanne Haraway (1976/2004). Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors That Shape Embryos. North Atlantic Books.
Tudor Baetu (forthcoming). Mechanism Schemas and the Relationship Between Biological Theories. In J. Williamson P. McKay (ed.), Causality in the Sciences.
Hilde Hein (1972). The Endurance of the Mechanism: Vitalism Controversy. Journal of the History of Biology 5 (1):159 - 188.
Garland E. Allen (2005). Mechanism, Vitalism and Organicism in Late Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Biology: The Importance of Historical Context. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (2):261-283.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads27 ( #45,693 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
