Reliability and epistemic merit
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):327 – 338 (1984)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTommi Lehtonen (2000). The Notion of Merit in Indian Religions. Asian Philosophy 10 (3):189 – 204.
Michael A. Bishop (2000). In Praise of Epistemic Irresponsibility: How Lazy and Ignorant Can You Be? Synthese 122 (1-2):179 - 208.
Barry Lam (2013). Calibrated Probabilities and the Epistemology of Disagreement. Synthese 190 (6):1079-1098.
Robert Audi (2009). Reliability as a Virtue. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Mark E. Wunderlich (2003). Vector Reliability: A New Approach to Epistemic Justification. Synthese 136 (2):237 - 262.
Robert G. Hudson (1994). Reliability, Pragmatic and Epistemic. Erkenntnis 40 (1):71 - 86.
Jesús Vega Encabo (2008). Epistemic Merit, Autonomy, and Testimony. Theoria 23 (1):45-56.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #64,404 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
