The cyclical ontogeny of ontology: An integrated developmental account of object and speech categorization
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):45 – 57 (2004)
More than a decade of experimental research confirms that external linguistic information provided in the form of word labels can induce a "mutually exclusive" bias against double naming and lead children to infer the name of novel objects and parts (Markman, 1989). Linguistic labels have also been shown to encourage more sophisticated reasoning, particularly with respect to superordinate and atypical object categorization (Gelman & Coley, 1990; Waxman & Markow, 1995). By contrast, however, the inverse possibility that the linguistic labeling of basic-level objects may also developmentally support the kind of "phonological reorganization" (Werker & Tees, 1984) observed within infant speech categorization has yet to be theoretically isolated and experimentally explored. Yet the dynamic of relying on labels to inform object categorization clearly presupposes that potential word labels themselves have already been classified into language-specific phonemic categories. However, a two-staged strategy of first relying on basic-level object categories to refine speech categorization, and then exploiting such learned speech categories to fine tune object categorization would reveal a cyclically opportunistic learner. A uniform assumption of a one to one pairing between (types of) words and (types of) objects allows bootstrapping not only from language to object classification, but also from basic object categorization to phonemic speech classification.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2005). The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Philippe G. Schyns, Robert L. Goldstone & Jean-Pierre Thibaut (1998). The Development of Features in Object Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):1-17.
Stephen Grossberg (1998). Self-Organizing Features and Categories Through Attentive Resonance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):27-28.
Elizabeth Spelke (2001). Recognition and Categorization of Biologically Significant Objects by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta): The Domain of Food. Cognition 82 (2):127-155.
Shimon Edelman & Sharon Duvdevani-Bar (1997). Similarity-Based Viewspace Interpolation and the Categorization of 3D Objects. In Proc. Edinburgh Workshop on Similarity and Categorization.
Sung-Joo Lim & Lori L. Holt (2011). Learning Foreign Sounds in an Alien World: Videogame Training Improves Non-Native Speech Categorization. Cognitive Science 35 (7):1390-1405.
James Tanaka (1998). Parts, Features, and Expertise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):37-38.
Dominic W. Massaro (1998). Integrating Cues in Speech Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):275-275.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #102,879 of 1,101,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,958 of 1,101,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?