David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Walter De Gruyter (2009)
How was the hypothetical character of theories of experiencethought about throughout the history of science? The essays cover periods from the middle ages to the 19th and 20th centuries. It is fascinating to see how natural scientists and philosophers were increasingly forced to realize that a natural science without hypotheses is not possible.
|Keywords||Hypothesis/Hypothese Convention/Konvention Science Methodology/Wissenschaft Methodologie Realism/Realismus Pluralism/Pluralismus Concept of science/Wissenschaftsbegriff Mechanics/Mechnik|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$84.49 new (40% off) $84.54 used (40% off) $140.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.32.R45.S54 2009|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Nickles (1988). Truth or Consequences? Generative Versus Consequential Justification in Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:393 - 405.
Daniel J. Boorstin, “The Greatest Obstacle to Discovery is Not Ignorance – It is the Illusion of Knowledge.”.
Henri Poincaré (1946). The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, the Value of Science, Science and Method. Lancaster, Pa.,The Science Press.
R. S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.) (1974). Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Boston,Reidel.
Andreas Hüttemann (2009). Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz’s Philosophy of Science. In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Natural Sciences. de Gruyter.
Ernest Sosa (1967). Hypothetical Reasoning. Journal of Philosophy 64 (10):293-305.
Mark Holowchak (2007). Critical Reasoning and Science : Looking at Science with an Investigative Eye. University Press of America.
Reed Richter (2002). What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Edward Grant (2010). The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Catholic University of America Press.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads16 ( #146,415 of 1,696,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #79,846 of 1,696,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?