David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1994)
How do we form and modify our beliefs about the world? It is widely accepted that what we believe is determined by evidence, and is therefore not directly under our control; but according to what criteria is the credibility of the evidence established? Professor Helm argues that no theory of knowledge is complete without standards for accepting and rejecting evidence as belief-worthy. These standards, or belief-policies, are not themselves determined by evidence, but determine what counts as credible evidence. Unlike single beliefs, belief-policies are directly subject to the will, and therefore to the possibility of weakness of will and self-deception. Helm sets out to interpret standard epistemological positions in terms of belief-policies, and to illustrate their operation in the history of philosophy. He establishes connections between belief-policies, responsibility for beliefs, and the desirability of toleration, before reassessing fideism in the light of his argument.
|Keywords||Belief and doubt|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$28.95 used (77% off) $39.95 new (69% off) $124.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD215.H439 1994|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Trent Dougherty & Chris Tweedt (2015). Religious Epistemology. Philosophy Compass 10 (8):547-559.
Krista Lawlor (2013). Exploring the Stability of Belief: Resiliency and Temptation. Inquiry 57 (1):1-27.
Rik Peels (2013). Belief-Policies Cannot Ground Doxastic Responsibility. Erkenntnis 78 (3):561-569.
Ronney Mourad (2008). Choosing to Believe. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):55 - 69.
Mark Vorobej (2011). Distant Peers. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):708-722.
Similar books and articles
Aaron Rizzieri (2009). Evidence Does Not Equal Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 153 (2):235-242.
Jake Chandler (2013). Transmission Failure, AGM-Style. Erkenntnis 78 (2):383-398.
Darren Bradley (2007). Bayesianism And Self-Locating Beliefs. Dissertation, Stanford University
Alvin Plantinga (1986). Intellectual Sophistication and Basic Belief in God. Faith and Philosophy 3:306-312.
David J. Owens (2003). Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
Nathan Segars (2006). The Will and Evidence Toward Belief: A Critical Essay on Jonathan E. Adler's Belief's Own Ethics. Social Epistemology 20 (1):79 – 91.
John Cottingham (2009). Why Believe? Continuum.
Andrew Chignell, The Ethics of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #213,847 of 1,796,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,135 of 1,796,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?