Calvin and Bernard on Freedom and Necessity: A Reply to Brümmer

Religious Studies 30 (4):457 - 465 (1994)
Abstract
It is argued that Calvin does not veer between two incompatible accounts of grace, freedom and necessity in "Institutes II". 2, but presents a consistent position. The consistency is evident once it is seen that Calvin carefully distinguished between necessity and compulsion. For him not all necessitated acts are compelled, but all human acts which are the outcome of efficacious divine grace are necessitated by that grace. Because Calvin is consistent, there is no need to suppose that he has mistaken the causal sufficiency of divine saving grace for its causal importance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Seth Benardete (2007). Freedom : Grace and Necessity. In Richard L. Velkley (ed.), Freedom and the Human Person. Catholic University of America Press.
Heidi Russell (2010). Efficacious and Sufficient Grace. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):353-372.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

2 ( #354,724 of 1,102,872 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #297,281 of 1,102,872 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.