David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:141-151 (2001)
Within the Western tradition we can find important and interesting philosophical differences between the continental European and the Anglo-American ethical and political outlooks towards biotechnology. The Anglo-American attitude appears based on naturalistic and empiricist views, while continental European viewpoints are built on idealistic liberal humanism. A Northern European view integrates both of the above-mentioned liberal traditions. The main problem is that although these different outlooks can be said to be liberal in their common promotion of equality, autonomy, and individual rights, they still tend to conflict. I purpose to explicate the main differences of these liberalisms and to analyze how they affect the ethical views towards biotechnology in the Western world. Secondly, I will search for the shared values involved in these approaches in order to find common ground for open discussion on the ethical problems involved in biotechnological development
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Will Kymlicka & Magda Opalski (eds.) (2002). Can Liberal Pluralism Be Exported?: Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. OUP Oxford.
Weixi Hu (2007). On Confucian Communitarianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):475-487.
Jeffrey Friedman (1994). The Politics of Communitarianism. Critical Review 8 (2):297-340.
Michael G. Barnhart (2012). Theory and Comparison in the Discussion of Buddhist Ethics. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):16-43.
P. Theobald (1992). The Advent of Liberalism and the Subordination of Agrarian Thought in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):161-181.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1990). The Satanic Novel: A Philosophical Dialogue on Blasphemy and Censorship. Inquiry 33 (4):377 – 400.
Charles Ess (2006). Ethical Pluralism and Global Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):215-226.
Helmut Heit (2007). Euro-Centrism and What We Owe the Ancient Greeks. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:99-103.
Mark S. Cladis (1995). Education, Virtue and Democracy in the Work of Emile Durkheim. Journal of Moral Education 24 (1):37-52.
Igor Yevlampiev (2009). Man and Mind in the Philosophy of Boris N. Chicherin. Studies in East European Thought 61 (2/3):113 - 121.
Mary I. Bockover (2010). Confucianism and Ethics in the Western Philosophical Tradition II: A Comparative Analysis of Personhood. Philosophy Compass 5 (4):317-325.
J. Baird Callicott (1982). Traditional American Indian and Western European Attitudes Toward Nature: An Overview. Environmental Ethics 4 (4):293-318.
Filiz Kartal (2006). The Rights-Bearing Citizen as a Problematic Actor of Liberal Politics. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:159-163.
Anthony Pagden (2003). Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe's Imperial Legacy. Political Theory 31 (2):171-199.
William B. Carlin & Kelly C. Strong (1995). A Critique of Western Philosophical Ethics: Multidisciplinary Alternatives for Framing Ethical Dilemmas. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):387 - 396.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads13 ( #272,650 of 1,907,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #108,237 of 1,907,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?