Informants a potential threat to confidentiality in small studies

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):149-152 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Providing proper protection of confidentiality, by preventing personal data from falling into the hands of third parties, is one of the core responsibilities of researchers towards research participants. However, even if researchers do their best in this regard, it does not guarantee that breaches of confidentiality will be avoided. This paper addresses the case of small qualitative studies, arguing that researchers cannot guarantee their informants’ confidentiality, since that confidentiality may be compromised by actions taken by the informants themselves. In order to reduce the risk of this specific threat to confidentiality, additional precautions need to be taken. Some potential solutions to the problem are suggested and discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medical confidence.J. Havard - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (1):8-11.
Confidentiality revisited.Ke Yu - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):161-172.
The Limits of Confidentiality.Paul Cain - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (2):158-165.
Stereotype Threat, Epistemic Injustice, and Rationality.Stacey Goguen - 2016 - In Michael Brownstein & Jennifer Mather Saul (eds.), Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 216-237.
Play, dreams, and simulation.J. A. Cheyne - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):918-919.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
8 (#1,283,306)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?