Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 37 (3):249-258 (2001)
|Abstract||I argue on three distinct grounds that the contrast between speaking and revealing is nothing like so sharp as Wolterstorff maintains in Divine Discourse. Speaking may be revealing: in speaking a person may reveal much about himself. Putative divine speaking can only be made intelligible given a background of what I refer to as INIS revelation, and in revealing, or more exactly, in having revealed, God may still speak.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Balázs M. Mezei (2006). Divine Revelation and Human Person. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
Dan Haggerty (2009). Speaking for Others. Social Philosophy Today 25:109-122.
John Peterson (2004). Truth and Exemplarism. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):69-77.
Erazim Kohák (1992). Speaking to Trees. Critical Review 6 (2-3):371-388.
Joshua Ben David Nichols (2006). The Ab-Omination of Desolation Speaking or on the Consequences of Speaking Ab-Solutely. International Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):101-118.
Michael Levine (1998). God Speak. Religious Studies 34 (1):1-16.
John Woods (2002). Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial. [REVIEW] Argumentation 16 (1):59-79.
Merold Westphal (2001). On Reading God the Author. Religious Studies 37 (3):271-291.
Nancy Vansieleghem & Jan Masschelein (2012). Education as Invitation to Speak: On the Teacher Who Does Not Speak. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):85-99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,583 of 751,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,892 of 751,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?