David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In R. Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press (1878)
The problems which that earlier period considered fundamental to all science were those of the theory of knowledge: What is true in our sense perceptions and thought? and In what way do our ideas correspond to reality? Philosophy and the natural sciences attack these questions from opposite directions, but they are the common problems of both. Philosophy, which is concerned with the mental aspect, endeavours to separate out whatever in our knowledge and ideas is due to the effects of the material world, in order to determine the nature of pure mental activity. The natural sciences, on the other hand, seek to separate out definitions, systems of symbols, patterns of representation, and hypotheses, in order to study the remainder, which pertains to the world of reality whose laws they seek, in a pure form. Both try to achieve the same separation, though each is interested in a different part of the divided field.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lydia Patton (2009). Signs, Toy Models, and the A Priori. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (3):281-289.
Scott Edgar (2008). Paul Natorp and the Emergence of Anti-Psychologism in the Nineteenth Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):54-65.
Joel Michell (1993). The Origins of the Representational Theory of Measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (2):185-206.
S. P. Fullinwider (1990). Hermann Von Helmholtz: The Problem of Kantian Influence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (1):41-55.
Similar books and articles
Sarah McGrath (2004). Moral Knowledge by Perception. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):209–228.
K. Ramakrishna Rao (2005). Perception, Cognition, and Consciousness in Classical Hindu Psychology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (3):3-30.
John H. Dreher (2002). Can There Be Brute, Contingent Moral Facts. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):23 - 30.
Bertrand Russell (1927). Substance. Philosophy 2 (05):20-.
Herbert Hochberg (1981). Natural Necessity and Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 48 (3):386-399.
Christian Hick (1999). The Art of Perception: From the Life World to the Medical Gaze and Back Again. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2):129-140.
James W. McAllister (1997). Laws of Nature, Natural History, and the Description of the World. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):245 – 258.
Julio Cesar Arroyave (1949). Introduccion a la Filosofia de Las Ciencias. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (3):389-399.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #25,577 of 1,101,944 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,857 of 1,101,944 )
How can I increase my downloads?