Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):184-211 (2001)
|Abstract||Three principal varieties of mathematical structuralism are compared: set-theoretic structuralism (‘STS’) using model theory, Shapiro's ante rem structuralism invoking sui generis universals (‘SGS’), and the author's modal-structuralism (‘MS’) invoking logical possibility. Several problems affecting STS are discussed concerning, e.g., multiplicity of universes. SGS overcomes these; but it faces further problems of its own, concerning, e.g., the very intelligibility of purely structural objects and relations. MS, in contrast, overcomes or avoids both sets of problems. Finally, it is argued that the modality of MS or a close cousin appears at crucial junctures in both STS and SGS, so that the above outcome is not obviously tendentious.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Geoffrey Hellman (2003). Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):129-157.
Ken Akiba (2000). Indefiniteness of Mathematical Objects. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):26--46.
Christopher Menzel (1990). Structuralism and Conceptual Change in Mathematics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:397 - 401.
Charles Parsons (2004). Structuralism and Metaphysics. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):56--77.
Katherine Brading & Elaine Landry (2006). Scientific Structuralism: Presentation and Representation. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):571-581.
Mike Fuller (1996). Puppets and Pebbles and Ripples and Strings: Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted. Cogito 10 (1):49-55.
Julian C. Cole (2010). Mathematical Structuralism Today. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):689-699.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #15,110 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,099 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?