On a claim by Skyrms concerning lawlikeness and confirmation
Philosophy of Science 35 (3):274-278 (1968)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWolfgang Spohn (2005). Enumerative Induction and Lawlikeness. Philosophy of Science 72 (1):164-187.
R. G. Swinburne (1970). Choosing Between Confirmation Theories. Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Peter Achinstein (1963). Variety and Analogy in Confirmation Theory. Philosophy of Science 30 (3):207-221.
James E. Roper (1982). Models and Lawlikeness. Synthese 52 (2):313 - 323.
Aron Edidin (1988). From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Phillip J. Rody (1978). (C) Instances, the Relevance Criterion, and the Paradoxes of Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):289-302.
G. H. Merrill (1979). Confirmation and Prediction. Philosophy of Science 46 (1):98-117.
Marsha Hanen (1971). Confirmation and Adequacy Conditions. Philosophy of Science 38 (3):361-368.
Branden Fitelson (2006). The Paradox of Confirmation. Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #89,098 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
