David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 26 (3):362-382 (2012)
It is common to think of addiction as involving behavior which in some sense is ?out of control.? But does this mean addictive actions occur because of compulsion or because of ordinary weakness of will? Many philosophers argue that addictive actions occur because of weakness of will, since there is plenty of evidence suggesting that they are not caused by irresistible desires. In fact, addicts seem, in general, to perform these actions freely in the sense of having the ability to refrain from doing so. In this paper I argue, first, that it is not the addiction-as-compulsion view that is mistaken, but rather the view that irresistible desires are a defining feature of compulsion. Second, drawing on some results in addiction neuroscience, I construct and defend a new analysis of compulsivity that distinguishes addictive from weak-willed actions in a way that is consistent with the view that addictive actions are performed freely
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Piers Benn (2007). Disease, Addiction and the Freedom to Resist. Philosophical Papers 36 (3):465-481.
Kent C. Berridge (2009). Wanting and Liking: Observations From the Neuroscience and Psychology Laboratory. Inquiry 52 (4):378 – 398.
Jsbt Evans & Kenny Coventry (2006). A Dual-Process Approach to Behavioral Addiction: The Case of Gambling. In Reinout W. Wiers & Alan W. Stacy (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Sage Publications Ltd.
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1988). The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Holton & Kent Berridge (forthcoming). Addiction Between Compulsion and Choice. In Neil Levy (ed.), Addiction and Self-Control. Oxford University Press.
Jon Elster (ed.) (1999). Addiction: Entries and Exits. Russell Sage Publications.
Bennett Foddy & Julian Savulescu (2010). A Liberal Account of Addiction. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):1-22.
Gary Watson (1977). Skepticism About Weakness of Will. Philosophical Review 86 (3):316-339.
James Beebe (2013). Weakness of Will, Reasonability, and Compulsion. Synthese 190 (18):4077-4093.
Alfred Mele (2010). Weakness of Will and Akrasia. Philosophical Studies 150 (3):391–404.
Eric Matthews (2010). Explaining Addiction. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):23-26.
Peter J. Cohen (2002). Untreated Addiction Imposes an Ethical Bar to Recruiting Addicts for Non-Therapeutic Studies of Addictive Drugs. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):73-81.
Kevin Zaragoza (2006). What Happens When Someone Acts Compulsively? Philosophical Studies 131 (2):251 - 268.
Helen Keane (2004). Disorders of Desire: Addiction and Problems of Intimacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):189-204.
Maria Alvarez & John Hyman (1998). Agents and Their Actions. Philosophy 73 (2):219-245.
Helen Steward (2000). Do Actions Occur Inside the Body? Mind and Society 1 (2):107-125.
Patrizia Russo, Candida Nastrucci, Giulio Alzetta & Clara Szalai (2011). Tobacco Habit: Historical, Cultural, Neurobiological, and Genetic Features of People's Relationship with an Addictive Drug. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (4):557-577.
Benjamin Mossel (2009). Negative Actions. Philosophia 37 (2):307-333.
Added to index2012-04-11
Total downloads34 ( #51,080 of 1,101,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #35,000 of 1,101,740 )
How can I increase my downloads?