David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Contemporary epistemologists are roughly divided into those relying largely on common-sense considerations and focusing on examples and counterexamples for advancing or rejecting various epistemological theses, and those applying a variety of tools and methods from logic, computability theory or probability theory to the theory of knowledge. The two sorts, and the traditions to which they hitherto are taken to belong, have unfortunately proceeded largely in isolation from one another. But on closer examination the approaches have much in common, may be bridged for their mutual beneﬁt and the advancement of epistemology in general. Here are 7 ways of doing it as the invited papers in this special issue of Philosophical Studies demonstrate the fruitful interaction between informal considerations and various formal apparata in order to support, sharpen, undermine, realize, or contribute in some other pertinent way to fundamental epistemological themes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vincent F. Hendricks (2006). Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Allo (2008). Vincent Hendricks, Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 69 (3):427-432.
Jeffrey Helzner & Vincent Hendricks (2012). Agency and Interaction What We Are and What We Do in Formal Epistemology. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 2.
Vincent F. Hendricks (2006). Introduction: 8 Bridges Between Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 128 (1):1 - 5.
Vincent Hendricks (ed.) (2008). New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Franz Huber, Formal Representations of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Heinrich Wansing (2006). Doxastic Decisions, Epistemic Justification, and the Logic of Agency. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):201 - 227.
Franz Huber (2006). Review of Vincent F. Hendricks, Mainstream and Formal Epistemology (Cambridge University Press 2006). [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 26 (4):257-259.
Vincent F. Hendricks & John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Paul Gochet (2007). Vincent F. Hendricks, Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. Studia Logica 86 (1):139-144.
Graham Priest (2009). Vincent F. Hendricks Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):433-437.
John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Vincent F. Hendricks (2003). Active Agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):469-495.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads15 ( #122,762 of 1,410,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,804 of 1,410,463 )
How can I increase my downloads?