David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):29-48 (2001)
The present paper studies the general implications of theprinciple of compositionality for the organization of grammar.It will be argued that Janssen''s (1986) requirement that syntax andsemantics be similar algebras is too strong, and that the moreliberal requirement that syntax be interpretable into semanticsleads to a formalization that can be motivated and applied more easily,while it avoids the complications that encumber Janssen''s formalization.Moreover, it will be shown that this alternative formalization evenallows one to further complete the formal theory of compositionality, inthat it is capable of clarifying the role played by translation,model-theoretic interpretation and meaning postulates,of which the latter two aspects received little or no attention inMontague (1970) and Janssen (1986).
|Keywords||compositionality formal semantics Frege's principle interpretability many-sorted algebra meaning postulates model-theoretic interpretation Montague grammar semiotics similarity syntax-semantics interface translation universal algebra universal grammar|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Pagin (2010). Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants. Philosophy Compass 5 (3):250-264.
Theo M. V. Janssen (2013). Compositional Natural Language Semantics Using Independence Friendly Logic or Dependence Logic. Studia Logica 101 (2):453-466.
Similar books and articles
John Collins (2002). Horwich's Sting. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):213-228.
Emmon Bach, ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: I: Syntactic and Semantic Assumptions: Compositionality.
Chris Barker & Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.) (2007). Direct Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
Nissim Francez, Roy Dyckhoff & Gilad Ben-Avi (2010). Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases. Studia Logica 94 (3):381 - 401.
Theo M. V. Janssen (2001). Frege, Contextuality and Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):115-136.
Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1991). Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.
Mark McCullagh (2003). Do Inferential Roles Compose? Dialectica 57 (4):431-38.
Peter Pagin (2009). Compositionality, Understanding, and Proofs. Mind 118 (471):713 - 737.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #101,235 of 1,725,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,403 of 1,725,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?