Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):29-48 (2001)
|Abstract||The present paper studies the general implications of theprinciple of compositionality for the organization of grammar.It will be argued that Janssen''s (1986) requirement that syntax andsemantics be similar algebras is too strong, and that the moreliberal requirement that syntax be interpretable into semanticsleads to a formalization that can be motivated and applied more easily,while it avoids the complications that encumber Janssen''s formalization.Moreover, it will be shown that this alternative formalization evenallows one to further complete the formal theory of compositionality, inthat it is capable of clarifying the role played by translation,model-theoretic interpretation and meaning postulates,of which the latter two aspects received little or no attention inMontague (1970) and Janssen (1986).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Collins (2002). Horwich's Sting. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):213-228.
Peter Pagin (2009). Compositionality, Understanding, and Proofs. Mind 118 (471):713-737.
Mark McCullagh (2003). Do Inferential Roles Compose? Dialectica 57 (4):431-38.
Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1991). Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.
Theo M. V. Janssen (2001). Frege, Contextuality and Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):115-136.
Nissim Francez, Roy Dyckhoff & Gilad Ben-Avi (2010). Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases. Studia Logica 94 (3).
Chris Barker & Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.) (2007). Direct Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
Emmon Bach, ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: I: Syntactic and Semantic Assumptions: Compositionality.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #67,643 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?