Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1) (2009)
|Abstract||The conditions of life of many companion animals and the rate at which they are surrendered to shelters raise many ethical issues. What duties do we have towards the dogs that live in our society? To suggest answers to these questions, I first give four possible ways of looking at the relationship between man and dog: master–slave, employer–worker, parent–child, and friend–friend. I argue that the morally acceptable relationships are of a different kind but bears family resemblances to the latter three. As dogs are beings with an interest in their wellbeing, society has certain duties towards the dogs, which can be translated in legislation. But human beings also have special responsibilities towards the dogs they take into their care. Such responsibilities entail caring for their emotional and physical welfare, but also ensuring a bond of trust, which should not easily be broken.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith Burgess-Jackson (1998). Doing Right by Our Animal Companions. Journal of Ethics 2 (2):159-185.
Crawford L. Elder (2007). On the Phenomenon of “Dog- Wise Arrangement”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):132-155.
Colin Radford (1970). Hoping, Wishing, and Dogs. Inquiry 13 (1-4):100 – 103.
Manuela Wedl, Iris Schoberl, Barbara Bauer, Jon Day & Kurt Kotrschal (2011). Relational Factors Affecting Dog Social Attraction to Human Partners. Interaction Studies 11 (3):482-503.
Andrew Aberdein (2008). Logic for Dogs. In Steven D. Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Dog. Open Court.
Jonathan Benthall (ed.) (1973/1974). The Limits of Human Nature. New York,Dutton.
Eytan Zweig (2009). Number-Neutral Bare Plurals and the Multiplicity Implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):353-407.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,063 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?