David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16 (3):331-340 (1956)
An analysis of effectiveness of some of hume's arguments in a framework developed by the author. The author states his position that arguments attacking positions attempt to show that, Given the assumptions of a position, Certain consequences are incompatible with it--A valid species of "argumentum ad hominem". Although this species does not work for constructive philosophical "proofs," it will work inversely in arguments (defending such proofs) which cite possible objections. These charge "petitio": the objection assumes what the position denies or "vice versa". Eight arguments are judged as "ad hominem" or as charging "petitio" and as effective or ineffective in either case. The analyses elaborate the author's position, And the mode of analysis is suggested as an adjunct to considering a philosopher's conclusions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Abraham Sesshu Roth (2011). The Necessity of “Necessity”: Hume's Psychology of Sophisticated Causal Inference. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):263-287.
Berent Enç (1985). Hume on Causal Necessity: A Study From the Perspective of Hume's Theory of Passions. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (3):235 - 256.
Scott A. Shalkowski (1992). Supervenience and Causal Necessity. Synthese 90 (1):55-87.
Peter Dalton (2003). Hume's Third Cause. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:169-190.
Andrew Ward (2008). Proof and Demonstration: Hume's Account of the Causal Relation. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):23-37.
Markus Schrenk (2010). The Powerlessness of Necessity. Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
Stephen J. Boulter (2002). Hume on Induction: A Genuine Problem or Theology's Trojan Horse? Philosophy 77 (1):67-86.
Peter Millican (2009). Hume, Causal Realism, and Causal Science. Mind 118 (471):647-712.
David H. Sanford (1978). Causal Necessity and Logical Necessity. Philosophical Studies 33 (2):185 - 194.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #121,442 of 1,911,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #142,099 of 1,911,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?