Henry of Harclay: Ordinary Questions, XV-XXIX
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mark G. Henninger (ed.)
OUP/British Academy (2008)
This volume completes the first full edition of the later work of the medieval philosopher and theologian Henry of Harclay. In colloboration with Raymond Edwards, an English translation is printed on facing pages, making this work available to a much wider audience. The twenty-nine Quaestiones Ordinariae cover a range of topics in metaphysics, theology, physical science, philosophical anthropology and ethics, which were among the most important of those debated in the early fourteenth century. The articles provide a window to this era, as Harclay discusses many of the main questions of his day: whether and why we choose what is evil, how God can know the future and we can still be free, what a virtue is, whether the human soul survives death, whether all things are made up of atoms. This edition enables us to evaluate Harclay, not only in relation to other notable thinkers of his time (such as John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham) but to appreciate the inner coherence of his own thought. An extensive introduction to Harclay's life, works and doctrine is provided. The volumes will also benefit scholars following the debates among lesser-studied thinkers such as William of Alnwick, Thomas of Sutton, Nicholas Trivet, and Robert Walsingham, whom this edition shows to have been in dialogue with Harclay during the years of the composition of his Quaestiones, 1310-1317. Because of the clarity of Harclay's thought and style, now mirrored in the English translation, the Quaestiones Ordinariae are an ideal way to introduce students to key problems in medieval philosophy, as well as to enable scholars to deepen their knowledge of the debates of this period. Questions 1-14, together with an extensive introduction, were published as volume XVII in the Auctores series.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark G. Henninger (ed.) (2008). Henry of Harclay: Ordinary Questions, I-XIV. OUP/British Academy.
Mark Gerald Henninger (1989). Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250-1325. Oxford University Press.
Henninger (2008). Henry of Harclay on the Will's Ability to Hate God. The Modern Schoolman 86 (1-2):161-180.
Edith Dudley Sylla (1998). God, Indivisibles, and Logic in the Later Middle Ages: Adam Wodeham's Response to Henry of Harclay. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (01):69-87.
Jeffrey E. Brower, Medieval Theories of Relations. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Kilvington (1990). The Sophismata of Richard Kilvington: Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Pasnau (ed.) (2002). Mind and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Ibn Khaldūn (1969/2005). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. Princeton University Press.
Anton Charles Pegis & J. Reginald O'Donnell (eds.) (1974). Essays in Honour of Anton Charles Pegis. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Thomas Aquinas (2003). On Evil. OUP USA.
Thomas (2003). On Evil. Oxford University Press, USA.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2011). Review of Albert of Saxony, Quaestiones Circa Logicam (Twenty-Five Disputed Questions on Logic). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):249-250.
Immanuel Kant (1997). Lectures on Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?