Is the work of art a construct? A reply to professor Pepper

Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2020544

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The art of delight and the art of relief.Stephen C. Pepper - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (3):480-486.
On a descriptive theory of value a reply to professor Margolis.Stephen C. Pepper - 1969 - Zygon 4 (3):261-265.
Some comments on professor kahn’s paper.Stephen C. Pepper - 1950 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (1):51-55.
Critical judgment and professor pepper’s “eclecticism”.Sholom J. Kahn - 1950 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (1):46-50.
The work of art described from a double dispositional base.Stephen C. Pepper - 1965 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23 (4):421-427.
Further consideration of the aesthetic work of art.Stephen C. Pepper - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (8):274-279.
Professor Pepper on value theory.Joseph Margolis - 1958 - Ethics 69 (2):134-139.
Emotional distance in art.Stephen C. Pepper - 1946 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 4 (4):235-239.
Is non-objective art superficial?Stephen C. Pepper - 1953 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 11 (3):255-261.
Reply to professor Hoekstra.Stephen C. Pepper - 1945 - Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):101-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
250 (#78,225)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references